Michael Geerts vs Federico Cina Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 11 Sep at 01:21 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Geerts vs F. Cina

BEL
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Geerts 1 - 0 Cina
They have played 2 sets in total, with Michael Geerts winning 2 and Federico Cina winning 0. The last match between Michael Geerts and Federico Cina was at the Rennes Challenger, 11-09-2025, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Michael Geerts getting the victory 6-2 7-6(4).
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Geerts | 1 |
Cina | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) Rennes Challenger(09-11-25)
M. Geerts vs F. Cina H2H Profile
M. Geerts vs F. Cina Match Preview:
- Second Serve: Recently, Geerts has outperformed Cina in second serve points, securing 47.3% compared to Cina's 42.81%.
- Return Game: While Geerts has a stronger first serve return rate at 26.06%, Cina edges out in second serve returns with 47.55% compared to Geerts' 45.89%.
- Under Pressure: Geerts is slightly more effective at saving breakpoints, saving 52.38% versus Cina’s 50.71%—a crucial factor under pressure.
- Overall Performance: Cina leads overall match wins in the last year with a 67.14% win rate, while Geerts has managed 56.25%.
- Best Surface: Cina excels on indoor hard courts with a perfect record (100%), but Geerts performs best on hard surfaces with a 62% win rate.
- Player Level: Both players primarily compete in Challengers/ITF events, with Cina winning 63.41% of such matches compared to Geerts’ 50.98%.
- Opponent Quality: Cina has faced tougher opponents on average, with a mean rank of 318.14 versus Geerts' 378.73.
- Deciding Sets: Cina has a higher success rate in deciding sets, winning 62% compared to Geerts’ 56%.
- Break Point Conversion: In recent encounters, Cina converts break points more frequently at 32.1% compared to Geerts’ 29.84%.
Editorial Prediction (September 11, 2025, UTC):
As we prepare for the upcoming match, both players bring strengths to the court. Geerts shows prowess with his second serve success rate and ability to handle the pressure by saving more breakpoints. However, Cina's higher win rate against stronger opponents and his effectiveness in deciding sets may provide a competitive edge.
When examining surface preferences, Cina's flawless record on indoor hard courts gives him an advantage, especially given Geerts' struggles on grass. Despite Geerts having solid returns on the first serve, Cina compensates by leading in second serve returns.
Considering the performance data and trends from the past year, Cina appears to hold a slight edge in overall match prediction. While Geerts has demonstrated strong capabilities, Cina's consistent performance under deciding conditions suggests that he is more likely to emerge victorious in their upcoming encounter.
Michael Geerts vs Federico Cina Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Geerts vs F. Cina H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
13 | Games Won | 8 |
1 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
1:25:36 | Average Match Time | 1:25:36 |
70% (42/60) | 1st Serve % | 55% (33/60) |
81% (34/42) | 1st Serve Win % | 79% (26/33) |
50% (9/18) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (10/27) |
100% (3/3) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (1/1) |
40% (24/60) | Return Points Win % | 28% (17/60) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Geerts Recent Matches Played
F. Cina Recent Matches Played

M. Geerts vs F. Cina Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
56.31% (406/315) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.01% (61/46) |
55.90% (919/725) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.49% (135/104) |
52.16% (8081/7413) | Games Win/Loss | 52.24% (1191/1089) |
61.76% (189/117) | Hard Win/Loss | 61.02% (36/23) |
51.87% (139/129) | Clay Win/Loss | 54.55% (24/20) |
53.79% (78/67) | Indoor Hard W/L | 25.00% (1/3) |
0.00% (0/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
0.3 | Aces Per Game | 0.24 |
2289 | Aces Total | 272 |
0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
1584 | Total Double Faults | 273 |
1:24:37 | Average Match Time | 1:39:38 |
475.37 | Average Opponent Rank | 340.15 |
58% (23528/40260) | 1st Serve % | 61% (4440/7291) |
71% (16610/23528) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (3053/4440) |
51% (8534/16732) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (1421/2851) |
42% (1651/3949) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (323/757) |
39% (15937/40687) | Return Points Win % | 41% (3004/7377) |
33.33% (1/2) | Slam W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 40.00% (2/3) |
50.00% (1/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0.00% (0/9) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
48.97% (142/148) | Challenger W/L | 52.00% (26/24) |
62.98% (262/154) | Futures W/L | 65.31% (32/17) |
56% (399/708) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (60/105) |
0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
50% (113/228) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 67% (26/39) |
47% (100/213) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (13/27) |
86% (417/358) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (62/53) |
14% (417/59) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (62/9) |
16% (304/48) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (45/8) |